Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Corporate Use of Social Media

When I set out to compare Starbucks and Dunkin’ donuts, specifically on their use of social media, I was surprised at what I found.  Although if I gave it more thought ahead of time, I shouldn't have been shocked at what I found.  As you read through this post you’ll realize what I did, both companies use of social media is exactly tailored to each companies marketing strategies.
Starbucks

I started my journey with Starbucks.  Starbucks has a Facebook page, and the staple sections on Facebook, About & Photos, but what I found interesting is their international pages.  They offer various Facebook pages for international customers.  I think this is a great way to appeal to people of all nations.  It really creates a community type atmosphere for everyone to participate in and interact with each other.  What I like about the use of Facebook, they are posting the good, bad and ugly meaning not only are “likes” shared with fellow followers, but bad experiences as well.  That really puts a company out there, gives its customers a forum to express their concerns.  That’s valuable feedback, it allows Starbucks to see what concerns are out there real-time and they can take corrective action just as fast.

The Starbucks website is well laid out and simple considering all the ads and what not you can find on other websites.  It offers convenient drop down menus at the type that offers variety of information from the menu to rewards and buying Starbucks gear.  What I found very interesting and appealing to the social networking world that exists now, they offer “tweet a coffee.”  “You send can send coffee through twitter.”  I like the website, just like its product, it’s a classy simpleton.

 Speaking of Twitter, Starbucks is also on twitter, the second of the two social media sites promoted on the website.  What a great way to interactively promote its new tweet feature other than giving $5 Starbucks gift cards to the first 100,000 to use the tweet a coffee service.  Looks as there are pretty active, about a tweet a day, sometimes more.  They also have plenty of followers, 5,104,826 on twitter and 35 million likes on Facebook.










Turning our attention to Dunkin’ Donuts, their website offers a similar styled website with menu options on the top.  They also include links to their social media accounts, however they actually embed the widgets into the website, so you can see a snapshot of what’s going on right on the home page.  They also include a nice feature giving you the nearest location.  Dunkin’ Donuts not only promotes twitter and Facebook, but they also have a blog right on the home page and a section for YouTube videos. 

I like the use of twitter, especially the widget on the company’s home page of their website.  Just as Starbucks use of Facebook, this allows the customers to give interactive feedback as their experience Dunkin’ Donuts.  The one thing I liked better about Dunkin’ Donuts, they responded to tweets, this was more than I saws with Starbucks. 
Both the blog and YouTube videos offered first hand accounts of customer’s experiences and stories about Dunkin’ Donuts.  The blog dishes up a blend of fun stories about food and customer’s experience.  The YouTube videos seemed a bit contrived to me.  Overall though, they did offer a lot more content for those that chose to consume it than Starbucks did.

When it comes down to it, I believe both companies are accomplishing what they set out to do.  On the one hand, Starbucks keeps their website very simple, light and to the point.  This is how they market themselves as a company.  They don’t need to add the rift raft in order to get your business; they know they are a staple in the coffee game.   On the other hand, Dunkin’ Donuts is all about shoveling themselves into your face, getting as much content as they can out there to keep you interested.  While the difference between the two companies is quite obvious, I believe both of them are effective at using social media.  They both have a marketing approach, while different, that is effective and their use of social media and how they use it only supports what they are trying to accomplish.

Jeremy Waterman is a second time blogger, so take it easy on him.

References: